Quadro P1000 vs Arc Graphics 130V
Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2017). The Arc Graphics 130V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P1000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130V, it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 211.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+211.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and Arc Graphics 130V
Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the Arc Graphics 130V reaches 4,510 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the Arc Graphics 130V uses Xe², both on 14 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130V). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 1850 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495 | 4,510 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Xe² |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+9043% | 7 |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | 1850 MHz+22% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 15W — a 90.9% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 15W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 112.4 | 300.7+168% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P1000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Quadro P1000 costs 68% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.2 (Quadro P1000) vs 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) — the Quadro P1000 offers 212.2% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-68% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.2+212% | 18.0 |
| Codename | GP107 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | February 7 2017 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #466 | #463 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P1000 and Arc Graphics 130V
