Quadro P1000 vs GeForce RTX 3060
Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 278.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P1000.
| Insight | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-278.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+278.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $80), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4.7% better value per dollar than the Quadro P1000.
| Insight | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and GeForce RTX 3060
Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 278.1%. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495 | 16,995+278% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 3584+460% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.555 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+719% |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | 1777 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 112+250% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3.5 MB+1742% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P1000) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 123.8% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-76% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 242mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 112.4+12% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P1000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The Quadro P1000 costs 72.3% less ($209 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.2 (Quadro P1000) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 4.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-72% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.2 | 58.8+5% |
| Codename | GP107 | GA106 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #466 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P1000 and GeForce RTX 3060
