
Quadro P1000 vs GRID P6-4Q

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:

GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P6-4Q.
| Insight | Quadro P1000 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P1000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $150), it costs 47% less, resulting in a 90.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P1000 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+90.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and GRID P6-4Q

Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the GRID P6-4Q reaches 4,429 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the GRID P6-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495+1% | 4,429 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1536+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.555 TFLOPS | 2.218 TFLOPS+43% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 576 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-4Q has 2 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P1000) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000) vs 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the GRID P6-4Q's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 350W (GRID P6-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-60% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 112.4+154% | 44.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P1000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. The Quadro P1000 costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.2 (Quadro P1000) vs 29.5 (GRID P6-4Q) — the Quadro P1000 offers 90.5% better value. The Quadro P1000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-47% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.2+91% | 29.5 |
| Codename | GP107 | GM204 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #466 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












