
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 20: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 20: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P2000 Max-Q better than Radeon Pro Vega 20?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro Vega 20 make more sense than Quadro P2000 Max-Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Radeon Pro Vega 20

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q scores 5,353 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1283 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353+4% | 5,169 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+14% | 1283 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 0 MB. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-20% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 66.9+29% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GP107GL | Vega 12 |
| Release | July 5 2017 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #426 | #435 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













