Quadro P2200 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2200 is positioned at rank #72 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

98%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

86%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

82%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

82%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

80%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

80%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

77%

#57

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

675%

#72

Quadro P2200

MSRP: $429|Avg: $227

100%

#73

T1000

MSRP: $350|Avg: $382

100%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

99%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

97%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

92%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 19.3% higher G3D Mark score and 25% more VRAM (5 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	Quadro P2200	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+19.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-19.3%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (5 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $227 for the Quadro P2200, it costs 67% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 153.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P2200	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+153.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($227)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P2200 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Quadro P2200 leads by 19.3%. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2200	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	9,386+19%	7,869
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1280+43%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.822 TFLOPS+28%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1493 MHz	1665 MHz+12%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	80+43%	56
L1 Cache	480 KB	896 KB+87%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+25%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2200	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Quadro P2200 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Quadro P2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2200	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	5 GB+25%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+25%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P2200	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.1	12
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Quadro P2200	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 201mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Quadro P2200	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	201mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	125.1+19%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $227, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 67% less ($152 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (Quadro P2200) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 154% better value.