Quadro P3000 vs Arc Graphics 130T

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro P3000

250

6,384

+2.8%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

Arc Graphics 130T

15

6,208

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 is positioned at rank 135 and the Arc Graphics 130T is on rank 239, so the Quadro P3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

97%

#120

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1388%

#135

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#136

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

94%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

94%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

93%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

92%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

91%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

89%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

89%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

87%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

96%

#229

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

525%

#231

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

476%

#232

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

474%

#236

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

431%

#237

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

428%

#239

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

100%

#240

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

98%

#252

GeForce 720A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

93%

#253

GeForce GT 520M

MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A

91%

#254

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $60

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130T.

Insight	Quadro P3000	Arc Graphics 130T
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 221.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P3000	Arc Graphics 130T
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+221.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($80)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3000 Benchmark Check

Arc Graphics 130T Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and Arc Graphics 130T

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Arc Graphics 130T reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Arc Graphics 130T uses Xe+. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130T).

Feature	Quadro P3000	Arc Graphics 130T
G3D Mark Score	6,384+3%	6,208
Architecture	Pascal	Xe+
Shading Units	3840+54757%	7

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3000	Arc Graphics 130T
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	XeSS
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB. The Quadro P3000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Arc Graphics 130T
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	Shared
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	256-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Arc Graphics 130T
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T).

Feature	Quadro P3000	Arc Graphics 130T
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 15W — a 177.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130T). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Arc Graphics 130T
TDP	250W	15W-94%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	25.5	413.9+1523%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P3000 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Quadro P3000 costs 68% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.8 (Quadro P3000) vs 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) — the Quadro P3000 offers 221.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).