
Quadro P3000 vs Tesla M6

Quadro P3000
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 is positioned at rank 135 and the Tesla M6 is on rank 188, so the Quadro P3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M6
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M6.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P3000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $84), it costs 5% less, resulting in a 7.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($84) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and Tesla M6

Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,384+3% | 6,225 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+150% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+248% | 3.625 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+39% | 1180 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+150% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+150% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 has 4 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 62.3+144% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3000 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000 and now averages $84. The Quadro P3000 costs 4.8% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.8 (Quadro P3000) vs 74.1 (Tesla M6) — the Quadro P3000 offers 7.7% better value. The Quadro P3000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600-40% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-5% | $84 |
| Performance per Dollar | 79.8+8% | 74.1 |
| Codename | GP102 | GM204 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #141 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












