Quadro P3000 vs Tesla M6

NVIDIA

Quadro P3000

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M6

2015Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1180 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P3000 vs Tesla M6 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3000 vs Tesla M6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 70.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Tesla M6

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 66.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P3000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (6,384 vs 6,225), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P3000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 70.9% (10.6 vs 6.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro P3000 vs Tesla M6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

NVIDIA

Tesla M6

The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P3000Tesla M6
G3D Mark Score
6,384+3%
6,225
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3840+150%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.63 TFLOPS+248%
3.625 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1645 MHz+39%
1180 MHz
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
240+150%
96
L1 Cache
1.4 MB+150%
0.56 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P3000Tesla M6
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 carries 4 GB. Quadro P3000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3000 and 256-bit on the Tesla M6. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P3000Tesla M6
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureQuadro P3000Tesla M6
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

FeatureQuadro P3000Tesla M6
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro P3000Tesla M6
TDP
250W
100W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
25.5
62.3+144%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P3000 came in at $600, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Quadro P3000 was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (Quadro P3000) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the Quadro P3000 offers 71% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P3000 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro P3000Tesla M6
MSRP
$600-40%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
10.6+71%
6.2
Codename
GP102
GM204
Release
October 1 2016
August 30 2015
Ranking
#141
#388

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.