Quadro P6000
Radeon RX 6650M
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 6650M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 6650M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 6650M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 6650M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Radeon RX 6650M reaches 15,171 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2416 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512+2% | 15,171 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+114% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+46% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2416 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+114% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6650M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 has 23 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6650M carries 8 GB. Quadro P6000 gives you 193% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) — a 92.9% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro P6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6650M. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB+193% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+93% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 120W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0 | 126.4+104% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 6650M (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | — |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #141 | #148 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P6000 and Radeon RX 6650M
