Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 6650M
Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P6000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6650M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6650M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6650M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 193% more VRAM (23 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6650M.
| Insight | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+193%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P6000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P6000 and Radeon RX 6650M
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Radeon RX 6650M reaches 15,171 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2416 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512+2% | 15,171 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+114% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+46% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2416 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+114% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 comes with 23 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6650M has 8 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 193% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) — a 92.9% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB+193% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+93% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 120W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0 | 126.4+104% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6650M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | — |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #141 | #148 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P6000 and Radeon RX 6650M
