G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
148.3% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$60 MSRP

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

✅5006.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 21914.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5006.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8765% in PassMark G3D (5,319 vs 60), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon 2100 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, and 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $89 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 21914.8% (88.7 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon 2100 vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the Radeon RX 6300 leads by 8765%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 2100	Radeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score	60	5,319+8765%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	384	768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS+369%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	2400 MHz+134%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	48+100%
L1 Cache	96 KB	256 KB+167%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon 2100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon 2100	Radeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 2100 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 6300 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 2100 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 2100	Radeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit+100%	32-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon 2100	Radeon RX 6300
DirectX	9.0b	12_2+33%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon 2100) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: Avivo vs VCN 3.0.

Feature	Radeon 2100	Radeon RX 6300
Encoder	Avivo	VCN 3.0
Decoder	Avivo	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 2100	Radeon RX 6300
TDP	50W	35W-30%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	160mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Perf/Watt	1.2	152.0+12567%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 2100 came in at $149, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 59.7% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Radeon 2100) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 22075% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2019).

Feature	Radeon 2100	Radeon RX 6300
MSRP	$149	$60-60%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	88.7+22075%
Codename	Polaris 24	Navi 24
Release	May 13 2019	January 4 2022
Ranking	#898	#379

Search Radeon 2100 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.