Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6300

AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
RX family
·······

Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 88.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

  • 35.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).

Trade-offs

  • 133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 760M instead at 5,449 vs 5,319, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of FSR 3 (2023), a 4nm process instead of 6nm, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 6300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 760M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 760M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6300).

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score
5,449+2%
5,319
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
4 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
512
768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS+44%
3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2599 MHz+8%
2400 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
48+50%
L1 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR 3 + AFMF
Ray Tracing Cores
8
12+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon 760M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 760M and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 760M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
64 GB/s
Bus Width
System
32-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 6300
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12_2
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 6300
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 3.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 80% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 6300
TDP
15W-57%
35W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
363.3+139%
152.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 6300
MSRP
$60
Codename
Phoenix
Navi 24
Release
January 31 2024
January 4 2022
Ranking
#421
#379

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.