RADEON IGP 320 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON IGP 320 is positioned at rank #424 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

369325%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

50%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

25%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON IGP 320 uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON IGP 320 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON IGP 320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX 100/200.

Insight	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce2 MX 100/200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON IGP 320 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the GeForce2 MX 100/200, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 226.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce2 MX 100/200
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+226.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($20)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON IGP 320 Benchmark Check

GeForce2 MX 100/200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 320 and GeForce2 MX 100/200

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 3 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON IGP 320 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Raw compute: 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce2 MX 100/200
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4608+1100%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.28 TFLOPS+2444%	0.7972 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2200 MHz+112%	1038 MHz
ROPs	128+700%	16
TMUs	288+1100%	24
L1 Cache	1 MB+614%	0.14 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce2 MX 100/200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce2 MX 100/200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300W versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 10W — a 187.1% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 320) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce2 MX 100/200
TDP	300W	10W-97%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	165mm
Height	—	64mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	55
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The RADEON IGP 320 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.1 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 100% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).