
RADEON IGP 320 vs GeForce4 440

RADEON IGP 320
Popular choices:

GeForce4 440
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 320 is positioned at rank 424 and the GeForce4 440 is on rank 755, so the RADEON IGP 320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON IGP 320 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The RADEON IGP 320 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 440 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 440 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON IGP 320.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON IGP 320 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the GeForce4 440, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 96% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 320 and GeForce4 440

RADEON IGP 320
The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 440
The GeForce4 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 440's 5 — the GeForce4 440 leads by 25%. The RADEON IGP 320 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce4 440 uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 384 (GeForce4 440). Raw compute: 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+1100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.28 TFLOPS+2145% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+87% | 1176 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+1500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 288+1100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) vs 1 MB (GeForce4 440) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300W versus the GeForce4 440's 33W — a 160.4% difference. The GeForce4 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 320) vs 350W (GeForce4 440). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 33W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce4 440 launched at $469 and now averages $49. The RADEON IGP 320 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 440) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 100% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-79% | $469 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-59% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GM108 |
| Release | November 4 2021 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #136 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















