RADEON IGP 320 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON IGP 320 is positioned at rank #424 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

369325%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

50%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

25%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 196625% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON IGP 320.

Insight	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-196625%)	✅Leading raw performance (+196625%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 52360% better value per dollar than the RADEON IGP 320.

Insight	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+52360%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($20)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON IGP 320 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 320 and GeForce GTX 1650

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 196625%. The RADEON IGP 320 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	4	7,869+196625%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Process Node	7 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4608+414%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.28 TFLOPS+580%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2200 MHz+32%	1665 MHz
ROPs	128+300%	32
TMUs	288+414%	56
L1 Cache	1 MB+14%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON IGP 320 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 320) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	300W	75W-75%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	0.0	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The RADEON IGP 320 costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 52350% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).