
RADEON IGP 320 vs GeForce3

RADEON IGP 320
Popular choices:

GeForce3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 320 is positioned at rank 424 and the GeForce3 is on rank 755, so the RADEON IGP 320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON IGP 320 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The RADEON IGP 320 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce3 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce3 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON IGP 320 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON IGP 320 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the GeForce3, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 96% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 320 and GeForce3

RADEON IGP 320
The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce3
The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 versus the GeForce3's 5 — the GeForce3 leads by 25%. The RADEON IGP 320 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce3 uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 384 (GeForce3). Raw compute: 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+1100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.28 TFLOPS+2706% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+134% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+1500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 288+1100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON IGP 320 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 has 65 MB. The RADEON IGP 320 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) vs 1 MB (GeForce3) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300W versus the GeForce3's 33W — a 160.4% difference. The GeForce3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 320) vs 350W (GeForce3). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 33W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce3 launched at $499 and now averages $49. The RADEON IGP 320 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.1 (GeForce3) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 100% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-80% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-59% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GM108 |
| Release | November 4 2021 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #136 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















