RADEON IGP 320 vs GeForce4 MX 420
RADEON IGP 320
Popular choices:
GeForce4 MX 420
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 320 is positioned at rank 424 and the GeForce4 MX 420 is on rank 747, so the RADEON IGP 320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 MX 420
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 MX 420 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON IGP 320 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce4 MX 420 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $20 for the RADEON IGP 320, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 150% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+150%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 320 and GeForce4 MX 420
RADEON IGP 320
The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
GeForce4 MX 420
The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 420 leads by 25%. The RADEON IGP 320 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce4 MX 420 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 420). Raw compute: 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 420). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+414% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.28 TFLOPS+529% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+40% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 288+350% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON IGP 320 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 420 has 65 MB. The RADEON IGP 320 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300W versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 25W — a 169.2% difference. The GeForce4 MX 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 320) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 420). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 25W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce4 MX 420 launched at $99 and now averages $10. The GeForce4 MX 420 costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.5 (GeForce4 MX 420) — the GeForce4 MX 420 offers 150% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 320 | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $99-1% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $10-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.5+150% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | November 4 2021 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #136 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON IGP 320 and GeForce4 MX 420
