RADEON IGP 320 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 320 is positioned at rank 424 and the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is on rank 745, so the RADEON IGP 320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

369325%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

50%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

25%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200

#735

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

180950%

#737

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

164033%

#738

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

163600%

#742

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

148767%

#743

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

147750%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

100%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

83%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

67%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

67%

#750

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

50%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

50%

#752

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

50%

#753

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

50%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

33%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

17%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

17%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON IGP 320 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2010). The RADEON IGP 320 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON IGP 320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.

Insight	RADEON IGP 320	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON IGP 320 Benchmark Check

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 320 and MOBILITY RADEON 9200

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 3 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON IGP 320 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 uses TeraScale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200).

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	7 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	4608+476%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.28 TFLOPS+1711%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	128+700%	16
TMUs	288+620%	40
L1 Cache	1 MB+1150%	0.08 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON IGP 320 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has 65 MB. The RADEON IGP 320 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+694%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 50W — a 142.9% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 320) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
TDP	300W	50W-83%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 0% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).