
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌59.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌59.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5700 better than Intel Arc Pro B60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B60 make more sense than Radeon Pro W5700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and Radeon Pro W5700

Intel Arc Pro B60
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 14,380+4% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+38% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+24% | 1930 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 2.5% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-2% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82-4% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 70.1+2% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799. The Intel Arc Pro B60 costs 37.4% less ($299 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 53.3% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-37% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6+53% | 18.0 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #175 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













