Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / RDNA 3.0) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+250%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU reaches 13,130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182 | 13,130 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+7% | 3584 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+41% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz+31% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+50% | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+7% | 224 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 28 GB+250% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 86.7% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 158W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 83.1+152% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3499 | — |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #157 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
