CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design reaches 13,444 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 ×2 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 40 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 320.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182 | 13,444+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+50% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+155% | 5.914 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz+70% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2.5 MB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 ×2+50% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 352 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) — a 145.5% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+145% | 352 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 80W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 168.1+409% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3499 | — |
| Codename | Navi 21 | TU104 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | April 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #157 | #188 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
