CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX Vega 56 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 56.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega 56 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $3,499 for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot, it costs 98% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 4510.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4510.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,499) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182+1% | 13,026 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+7% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+43% | 10.54 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz+34% | 1471 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+7% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) — a 110.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 384-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+111% | 410 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 2048-bit+433% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 62.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 210W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 280mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 62.0+88% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499 MSRP and currently averages $3499, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399 and now averages $75. The Radeon RX Vega 56 costs 97.9% less ($3424 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 173.7 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 4471.1% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $399-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3499 | $75-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 173.7+4471% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #157 | #199 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and Radeon RX Vega 56
