G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

✅34.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
776.9% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌90.5% higher power demand at 400W vs 210W.

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 766.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 400W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (13,182 vs 13,026), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 602 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX Vega 56 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,100 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 766.6% (32.6 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon RX Vega 56 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Radeon RX Vega 56

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1471 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Radeon RX Vega 56
G3D Mark Score	13,182+1%	13,026
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 5.0
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3840 ×2+7%	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS ×2+43%	10.54 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1967 MHz+34%	1471 MHz
ROPs	96 ×2+50%	64
TMUs	240 ×2+7%	224
L1 Cache	768 KB	896 KB+17%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Radeon RX Vega 56
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) — a 110.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 56.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Radeon RX Vega 56
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	864 GB/s+111%	410 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit	2048-bit+433%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Radeon RX Vega 56
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Radeon RX Vega 56
Encoder	VCN 4.0 (2x)	VCE 4.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0 (2x)	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 62.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Radeon RX Vega 56
TDP	400W	210W-48%
Recommended PSU	500W-23%	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	280mm	280mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75-12%
Perf/Watt	33.0	62.0+88%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot came in at $3499, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 56 was 88.6% cheaper ($3100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 757.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Radeon RX Vega 56
MSRP	$3499	$399-89%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	32.6+758%
Codename	Navi 21	Vega 10
Release	August 3 2021	August 14 2017
Ranking	#157	#199

Search Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot on Amazon

Search Radeon RX Vega 56 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.