
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 5600 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 5600 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 5600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅73.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1154.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 48.2 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 400W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 5600 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1179.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 400W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 5600 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Radeon RX 5600 XT
The Radeon RX 5600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,453 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the Radeon RX 5600 XT reaches 13,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 7.188 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182 | 13,453+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+67% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+110% | 7.188 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz+26% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+67% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5600 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT carries 6 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 336 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — a 157.1% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 5600 XT. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+157% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 XT).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 150W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 150W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 280mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 89.7+172% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot came in at $3499, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5600 XT was 92% cheaper ($3220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 48.2 (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon RX 5600 XT offers 1168.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $279-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 48.2+1168% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #157 | #187 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















