
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 6600S Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 6600S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 6600S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅62.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 6600S is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌774.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 400W vs 80W.
Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,099 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 763.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.5 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 400W, a 320W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 6600S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Radeon RX 6600S
The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the Radeon RX 6600S reaches 13,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6600S uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 ×2 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600S).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182+1% | 13,016 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+114% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+111% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz | 2000 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+114% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 ×2+114% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600S carries 4 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600S) — a 285.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6600S. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+286% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 80W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6600S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 280mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 80W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 280mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 162.7+393% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot came in at $3499, while the Radeon RX 6600S launched at $400. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6600S was 88.6% cheaper ($3099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 32.5 (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Radeon RX 6600S offers 755.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6600S (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $400-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 32.5+755% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #157 | #200 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















