Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
RTX A2000
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RTX A2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RTX A2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅44.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌677.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 70W.
- ❌67.7% longer card at 280mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,049 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 694.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 400W, a 330W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 280mm, a 113mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 ×2 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 26 (RTX A2000) vs 104.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182 | 13,464+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+15% | 3328 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+89% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz+64% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+131% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 3.3 MB+340% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 ×2+131% | 26 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and 128-bit on the RTX A2000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 140.4% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 70W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 192.3+483% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot came in at $3499, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, RTX A2000 was 87.1% cheaper ($3049 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 offers 686.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $450-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 29.9+687% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GA106 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #157 | #186 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and RTX A2000
