Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅59.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌1042.9% higher power demand at 400W vs 35W.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 400W, a 365W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile reaches 13,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 ×2 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 14 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) vs 56.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182 | 13,209 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+114% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+67% | 9.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz | 2520 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+300% | 24 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+329% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.8 MB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 ×2+329% | 14 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 167.8% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 35W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 377.4+1044% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | — |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GB207 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #157 | #244 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
