
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 6800M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 6800M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 6800M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅9.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 6800M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌484.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 22.2 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6800M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 489.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon RX 6800M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Radeon RX 6800M
The Radeon RX 6800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2116 MHz to 2390 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,295 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the Radeon RX 6800M reaches 13,295 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6800M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6800M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12.24 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800M). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 2390 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 ×2 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6800M).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182 | 13,295 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+50% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+23% | 12.24 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz | 2390 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 ×2+50% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800M carries 12 GB. Radeon RX 6800M gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800M) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6800M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6800M) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+125% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800M).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the Radeon RX 6800M's 145W — a 93.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 145W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 280mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 91.7+178% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot came in at $3499, while the Radeon RX 6800M launched at $599. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6800M was 82.9% cheaper ($2900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 22.2 (Radeon RX 6800M) — the Radeon RX 6800M offers 484.2% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $599-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 22.2+484% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 22 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #157 | #193 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















