Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot vs Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 64.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $114 versus $3,499 for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot, it costs 97% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2901.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2901.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,499) | ✅More affordable ($114) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64 reaches 12,891 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182+2% | 12,891 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2 | 4096+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+37% | 11.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz+46% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2 | 256+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 250W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 280mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 51.6+56% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499 MSRP and currently averages $3499, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 and now averages $114. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 96.7% less ($3385 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 113.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 2876.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $599-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3499 | $114-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 113.1+2876% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #157 | #202 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and Radeon Pro Vega 64
