Radeon Pro WX 3200
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 1060

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200

#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
98%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
93%
#116
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1331%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
96%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
96%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
90%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
90%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
89%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
89%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
88%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
87%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
86%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 355.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 3200.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-355.6%)
Leading raw performance (+355.6%)
Longevity
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1411% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1411%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and GeForce GTX 1060

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 355.6%. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
2,209
10,064+356%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
640
2560+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.385 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+541%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
160+400%
L1 Cache
160 KB
960 KB+500%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 6.3
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 93.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
TDP
65W-64%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
168mm
173mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
34.0
55.9+64%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 69.8% less ($139 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1410.8% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200GeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$199-20%
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$199
$60-70%
Performance per Dollar
11.1
167.7+1411%
Codename
Polaris 23
GP104
Release
July 2 2019
May 27 2016
Ranking
#659
#137