
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6870

Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro WX 3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6870 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6870.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (247mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6870 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 297.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+297.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon HD 6870

Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon HD 6870
The Radeon HD 6870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,206 points. Launch price was $239.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Radeon HD 6870 reaches 2,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 6870 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 6870). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6870).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,209 | 2,206 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1120+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.385 TFLOPS | 2.016 TFLOPS+46% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 224 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6870 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6870). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs None (Radeon HD 6870). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6870).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 6870's 151W — a 79.6% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 247mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-57% | 151W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 247mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C-4% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0+133% | 14.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Radeon HD 6870 launched at $239 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 6870 costs 74.9% less ($149 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 44.1 (Radeon HD 6870) — the Radeon HD 6870 offers 297.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-17% | $239 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | $50-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 44.1+297% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Barts |
| Release | July 2 2019 | October 21 2010 |
| Ranking | #659 | #661 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















