Radeon Pro WX 3200
VS
Radeon HD 7770

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 7770

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7770

2012Core: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon Pro WX 3200
65
2,209
+1.7%
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700U
brand logoRadeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3550H
brand logoRadeon HD 5850
brand logoRadeon 780M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 6800S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon HD 7770
80
2,173
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 M270X
brand logoRadeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3350U
brand logoRadeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
brand logoRadeon RX 570X
brand logoRadeon R9 285
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 6800S
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200

#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
98%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
93%
#116
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1331%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
96%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
96%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
90%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
90%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
89%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
89%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
88%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
87%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
86%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro WX 3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7770.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
Performance
✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 291.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
Cost Efficiency
❌Lower cost efficiency
✅Better overall value (+291.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)
✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 7770 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low25 FPS
medium19 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra7 FPS
1440p
low16 FPS
medium13 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
4K
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high4 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low26 FPS
medium15 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1440p
low18 FPS
medium11 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
4K
low6 FPS
medium4 FPS
high2 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low89 FPS
medium62 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra24 FPS
1440p
low26 FPS
medium18 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra7 FPS
4K
low7 FPS
medium5 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low72 FPS
medium46 FPS
high31 FPS
ultra15 FPS
1440p
low31 FPS
medium20 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra7 FPS
4K
low13 FPS
medium8 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low99 FPS
medium80 FPS
high66 FPS
ultra50 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS
medium60 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low50 FPS
medium40 FPS
high33 FPS
ultra25 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low98 FPS
medium78 FPS
high65 FPS
ultra49 FPS
1440p
low73 FPS
medium59 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low49 FPS
medium39 FPS
high33 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low99 FPS
medium80 FPS
high66 FPS
ultra50 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS
medium60 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low50 FPS
medium40 FPS
high32 FPS
ultra22 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low37 FPS
medium24 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1440p
low22 FPS
medium14 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra9 FPS
4K
low12 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon HD 7770

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon HD 7770

The Radeon HD 7770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,173 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Radeon HD 7770 reaches 2,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 7770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7770). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.28 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7770).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
G3D Mark Score
2,209+2%
2,173
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.385 TFLOPS+8%
1.28 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7770 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7770) — the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 7770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12_0
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7770). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 7770).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
Encoder
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 7770's 80W — a 20.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
TDP
65W-19%
80W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
210mm
Height
69mm
—
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
82°C
—
Perf/Watt
34.0+25%
27.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Radeon HD 7770 launched at $159 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 7770 costs 74.9% less ($149 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 43.5 (Radeon HD 7770) — the Radeon HD 7770 offers 291.9% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon HD 7770
MSRP
$199
$159-20%
Avg Price (30d)
$199
$50-75%
Performance per Dollar
11.1
43.5+292%
Codename
Polaris 23
Cape Verde
Release
July 2 2019
February 15 2012
Ranking
#659
#664