Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Quadro M600M

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz

Quadro M600M

2015Core: 837 MHzBoost: 876 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2,209

0.0%

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Quadro M600M

2,221

+0.5%

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank 131 and the Quadro M600M is on rank 25, so the Quadro M600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

98%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

93%

#116

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1331%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

100%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

99%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

96%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

96%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

90%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

90%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

89%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

89%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

88%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

87%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

86%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M600M

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

79%

#10

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

333%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

75%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

70%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

69%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

69%

#25

Quadro M600M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

100%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

89%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

83%

#36

T600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $180

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M600M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Quadro M600M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Check

Quadro M600M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Quadro M600M

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

Quadro M600M

The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Quadro M600M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro M600M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 384 (Quadro M600M). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Quadro M600M
G3D Mark Score	2,209	2,221
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.385 TFLOPS+106%	0.6728 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+100%	16
L1 Cache	160 KB+25%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Quadro M600M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M600M has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 2 MB (Quadro M600M) — the Quadro M600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Quadro M600M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Quadro M600M
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Quadro M600M
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	NVENC 4th Gen
Decoder	UVD 6.3	PureVideo HD (VP5)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Quadro M600M's 30W — a 73.7% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 350W (Quadro M600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Quadro M600M
TDP	65W	30W-54%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	82°C	75°C-9%
Perf/Watt	34.0	74.0+118%