Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 7600
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 650.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 3200.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-650.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+650.6%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $199), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 497.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro WX 3200.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+497.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($199) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX 7600
Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 650.6%. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,209 | 16,581+651% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.385 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+1470% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 512 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 87% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-61% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 240mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0 | 100.5+196% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 costs 20.4% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 497.3% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-26% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199-20% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 66.3+497% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Navi 33 |
| Release | July 2 2019 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #659 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX 7600
