Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 819.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 3200.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-819.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+819.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $199), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 553.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro WX 3200.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+553.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($199) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 819.5%. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,209 | 20,312+820% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 4864+660% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.385 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+1070% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 32 | 152+375% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 4.8 MB+2900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 101.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-68% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 242mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0 | 101.6+199% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 costs 28.9% less ($81 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 553.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-50% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199-29% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 72.5+553% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | GA104 |
| Release | July 2 2019 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #659 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 3200 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
