
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 150W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 230W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 230W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 150W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 8200 better than Radeon RX 5600 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5600 OEM make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 12,615 and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM reaches 12,333 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,615+2% | 12,333 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+75% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS+68% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+75% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 OEM is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 draws 230W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 150W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 82.2+50% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #210 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













