G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅5.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M260X

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 250 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
56.2% HIGHER MSRP
$139 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 250 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (1,051 vs 1,013), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62% (11.8 vs 7.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 250 scores 1,051 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 250) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 715 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score	1,051+4%	1,013
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8064 TFLOPS+47%	0.5491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1050 MHz+47%	715 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon R7 250) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M260X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M260X
DirectX	11.1	12 (11_1)+8%
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260X). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 M260X).

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M260X
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 250 draws 65W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon R7 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 250) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M260X
TDP	65W-13%	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85
Perf/Watt	16.2+20%	13.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 250 came in at $89, while the Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250 was 36% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) vs 7.3 (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 61.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260X (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP	$89-36%	$139
Performance per Dollar	11.8+62%	7.3
Codename	Oland	Opal
Release	October 8 2013	December 6 2015
Ranking	#871	#878

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.