Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R9 A375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R9 A375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R9 A375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 A375 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
81.6% HIGHER MSRP
$89 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅35.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Delivers 77% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 A375 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 250 instead at 1,051 vs 1,024, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 A375 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $89, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 77% (20.9 vs 11.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 A375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 250 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R9 A375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 250 scores 1,051 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 250) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	1,051+3%	1,024
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Boost Clock	1050 MHz+14%	925 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 A375.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon R7 250) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R9 A375
DirectX	11.1	12_0+8%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R9 A375
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 250 draws 65W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 73.7% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 250) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	65W	30W-54%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	168mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	16.2	34.1+110%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 250 came in at $89, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R9 A375 was 44.9% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 77.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 A375 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 250	Radeon R9 A375
MSRP	$89	$49-45%
Performance per Dollar	11.8	20.9+77%
Codename	Oland	Venus
Release	October 8 2013	2015
Ranking	#871	#877

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 A375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.