Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 5500M

AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

2019Core: 1375 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 5,954).
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Radeon RX 5500M

2019

Why buy it

  • +9.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 5500M better than Radeon 760M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,449 vs 5,954 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 5500M is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, the stronger feature stack with FSR upscaling instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 5500M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 9.3% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 5500M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon 760M still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Radeon RX 5500M?
Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 85W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 5500M. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 5500M currently gives you 9.3% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
1080p
low46 FPS92 FPS
medium29 FPS83 FPS
high21 FPS68 FPS
ultra12 FPS56 FPS
1440p
low32 FPS86 FPS
medium19 FPS75 FPS
high11 FPS59 FPS
ultra6 FPS49 FPS
4K
low12 FPS42 FPS
medium8 FPS39 FPS
high5 FPS27 FPS
ultra3 FPS24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
1080p
low91 FPS128 FPS
medium64 FPS96 FPS
high44 FPS68 FPS
ultra30 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low58 FPS84 FPS
medium38 FPS58 FPS
high29 FPS43 FPS
ultra21 FPS32 FPS
4K
low30 FPS38 FPS
medium21 FPS29 FPS
high17 FPS23 FPS
ultra11 FPS17 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
1080p
low245 FPS268 FPS
medium196 FPS214 FPS
high163 FPS179 FPS
ultra123 FPS134 FPS
1440p
low184 FPS201 FPS
medium147 FPS161 FPS
high123 FPS134 FPS
ultra92 FPS100 FPS
4K
low123 FPS134 FPS
medium98 FPS107 FPS
high77 FPS89 FPS
ultra53 FPS64 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
1080p
low154 FPS262 FPS
medium120 FPS204 FPS
high103 FPS174 FPS
ultra81 FPS134 FPS
1440p
low109 FPS201 FPS
medium87 FPS161 FPS
high74 FPS130 FPS
ultra58 FPS100 FPS
4K
low65 FPS97 FPS
medium52 FPS75 FPS
high42 FPS66 FPS
ultra30 FPS53 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Radeon RX 5500M

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 760M scores 5,449 versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 5,954 — the Radeon RX 5500M leads by 9.3%. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
G3D Mark Score
5,449
5,954+9%
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
4 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
512
1408+175%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS+15%
4.632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2599 MHz+58%
1645 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
88+175%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 760M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
224 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 2.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 140% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon RX 5500M
TDP
15W-82%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
363.3+419%
70.0