
Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070

Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:

Tesla C2050 / C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 560X is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Radeon RX 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 560X.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $40 for the Radeon RX 560X, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 36.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+36.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560X and Tesla C2050 / C2070

Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560X scores 3,340 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,340 | 3,428+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+129% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.611 TFLOPS+154% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 896 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 560X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Radeon RX 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560X draws 75W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 104.2% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 560X) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-68% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 44.5+209% | 14.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 560X launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 and now averages $30. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.5 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 36.9% better value. The Radeon RX 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-95% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.5 | 114.3+37% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
| Release | April 11 2018 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #556 | #569 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















