Radeon RX 560X
VS
Tesla C2050 / C2070

Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070

AMD

Radeon RX 560X

2018Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070

#311
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
10783%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
100%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
95%
#330
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
94%
#331
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
93%
#333
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
93%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
93%
#335
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
92%
#336
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
91%
#337
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
91%
#338
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
90%
#339
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
85%
#340
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
84%
#341
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 560X is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Radeon RX 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 560X.

InsightRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (248mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $40 for the Radeon RX 560X, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 36.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+36.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560X and Tesla C2050 / C2070

AMD

Radeon RX 560X

The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560X scores 3,340 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
G3D Mark Score
3,340
3,428+3%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Fermi
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1024+129%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.611 TFLOPS+154%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
64+14%
56
L1 Cache
256 KB
896 KB+250%
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 560X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Radeon RX 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560X draws 75W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 104.2% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 560X) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
TDP
75W-68%
238W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
248mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
44.5+209%
14.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 560X launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 and now averages $30. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.5 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 36.9% better value. The Radeon RX 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP
$129-95%
$2499
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$30-25%
Performance per Dollar
83.5
114.3+37%
Codename
Polaris 21
GF100
Release
April 11 2018
July 25 2011
Ranking
#556
#569