Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070

AMD

Radeon RX 560X

2018Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz

Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 560X

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $2,370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 1787.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • βœ…Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • βœ…Tesla C2050 / C2070 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560X is the less risky modern option long term.
  • βœ…Draws 75W instead of 238W, a 163W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • ❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1837.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 25.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ❌217.3% higher power demand at 238W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (3,428 vs 3,340), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 560X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Tesla C2050 / C2070 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,370 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1787.5% (25.9 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla C2050 / C2070 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX 560X

The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560X scores 3,340 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
G3D Mark Score
3,340
3,428+3%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Fermi
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1024+129%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.611 TFLOPS+154%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
64+14%
56
L1 Cache
256 KB
896 KB+250%
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560X and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) β€” the Radeon RX 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560X draws 75W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W β€” a 104.2% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 560X) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
TDP
75W-68%
238W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
β€”
248mm
Slots
β€”
2
Perf/Watt
44.5+209%
14.4
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX 560X came in at $129, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560X was 94.8% cheaper ($2370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.9 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 1.4 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) β€” the Radeon RX 560X offers 1750% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560X (2018 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP
$129-95%
$2499
Performance per Dollar
25.9+1750%
1.4
Codename
Polaris 21
GF100
Release
April 11 2018
July 25 2011
Ranking
#556
#569

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.