
Radeon RX 560X

Tesla C2050 / C2070
Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 560X
2018Why buy it
- β Costs $2,370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1787.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- β Tesla C2050 / C2070 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560X is the less risky modern option long term.
- β Draws 75W instead of 238W, a 163W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βOlder hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Tesla C2050 / C2070
2011Why buy it
- β 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- β2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β1837.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 25.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- β217.3% higher power demand at 238W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560X vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560X scores 3,340 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,340 | 3,428+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+129% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.611 TFLOPS+154% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 896 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560X and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) β the Radeon RX 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560X draws 75W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W β a 104.2% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 560X) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-68% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | β | 248mm |
| Slots | β | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 44.5+209% | 14.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 560X came in at $129, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560X was 94.8% cheaper ($2370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.9 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 1.4 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) β the Radeon RX 560X offers 1750% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560X (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-95% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.9+1750% | 1.4 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
| Release | April 11 2018 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #556 | #569 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















