CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 560X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560X | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 23.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560X | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560X and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560X scores 3,340 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,340 | 3,390+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+967% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 560X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 560X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560X draws 75W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 560X) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 44.5 | 113.0+154% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 560X launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX 560X costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.5 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Radeon RX 560X offers 23.2% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $100-22% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.5+23% | 67.8 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | April 11 2018 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #556 | #508 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 560X and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
