Radeon RX 560X vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

AMD

Radeon RX 560X

2018Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
·······

Radeon RX 560X vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 560X vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 560X

2018

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 29% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Delivers 30.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 25.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (3,390 vs 3,340), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 30.9% (33.9 vs 25.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon RX 560X vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX 560X

The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560X scores 3,340 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,340
3,390+1%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
14 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
1024+967%
96

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. Radeon RX 560X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560X and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560X draws 75W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 560X) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
44.5
113.0+154%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX 560X came in at $129, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.9 (Radeon RX 560X) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 30.9% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2018).

FeatureRadeon RX 560XTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$129
$100-22%
Performance per Dollar
25.9
33.9+31%
Codename
Polaris 21
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
April 11 2018
August 15 2020
Ranking
#556
#508

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.