
Radeon RX 590 vs Quadro M5000

Radeon RX 590
Popular choices:

Quadro M5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 590 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 590 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 590.
| Insight | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 590 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $120 for the Quadro M5000, it costs 46% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 82.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+82.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($65) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 590 and Quadro M5000

Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.

Quadro M5000
The Quadro M5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 29 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 861 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,406 points. Launch price was $2,856.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 590 scores 9,315 and the Quadro M5000 reaches 9,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 590 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro M5000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 590) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5000). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590) vs 4.252 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,315 | 9,406 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS+67% | 4.252 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz+49% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 768 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 590) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M5000) — a 21.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 590. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+21% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 590) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M5000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M5000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 590 draws 175W versus the Quadro M5000's 150W — a 15.4% difference. The Quadro M5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 590) vs 500W (Quadro M5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 150W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.2 | 62.7+18% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 590 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Quadro M5000 launched at $999 and now averages $120. The Radeon RX 590 costs 45.8% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 143.3 (Radeon RX 590) vs 78.4 (Quadro M5000) — the Radeon RX 590 offers 82.8% better value. The Radeon RX 590 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-72% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65-46% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 143.3+83% | 78.4 |
| Codename | Polaris 30 | GM204 |
| Release | November 15 2018 | June 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #285 | #280 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















