Radeon RX 590
VS
Radeon R9 Fury X

Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon R9 Fury X

AMD

Radeon RX 590

2018Core: 1469 MHzBoost: 1545 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 590 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 590 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 Fury X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 590 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 590 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $80 for the Radeon R9 Fury X, it costs 19% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 22.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+22.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($65)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 590 and Radeon R9 Fury X

AMD

Radeon RX 590

The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 590 scores 9,315 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 590 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 590) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score
9,315
9,382
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
4096+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.119 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock
1545 MHz+47%
1050 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
144
256+78%
L1 Cache
0.56 MB
1 MB+79%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 590 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 590 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 590) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit.

FeatureRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
512 GB/s+100%
Bus Width
256-bit
4096-bit+1500%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 590) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
DirectX
12.0
12.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

FeatureRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
Encoder
VCE 3.4
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 6.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 590 draws 175W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 44.4% difference. The Radeon RX 590 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 590) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
TDP
175W-36%
275W
Recommended PSU
500W-17%
600W
Power Connector
8-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
241mm
195mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
60°C-25%
Perf/Watt
53.2+56%
34.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 590 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649 and now averages $80. The Radeon RX 590 costs 18.8% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 143.3 (Radeon RX 590) vs 117.3 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon RX 590 offers 22.2% better value. The Radeon RX 590 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon RX 590Radeon R9 Fury X
MSRP
$279-57%
$649
Avg Price (30d)
$65-19%
$80
Performance per Dollar
143.3+22%
117.3
Codename
Polaris 30
Fiji
Release
November 15 2018
June 24 2015
Ranking
#285
#282