
Radeon RX 590 vs RTX A1000 Mobile

Radeon RX 590
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A1000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 590 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 590 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A1000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 590 and RTX A1000 Mobile

Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.

RTX A1000 Mobile
The RTX A1000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 590 scores 9,315 and the RTX A1000 Mobile reaches 9,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 590 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RTX A1000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 590) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1140 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,315 | 9,463+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS+52% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz+36% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+125% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 2 MB+257% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 590 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Mobile has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 590 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 590) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Mobile). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 590 draws 175W versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 60W — a 97.9% difference. The RTX A1000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 590) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 60W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.2 | 157.7+196% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 590 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 30 | GA107 |
| Release | November 15 2018 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #285 | #277 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















