Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

98%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

97%

#47

Radeon RX 6700S

MSRP: $479|Avg: $300

95%

#150

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

329%

#152

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

298%

#153

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

297%

#157

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

270%

#158

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

268%

#160

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#172

GeForce GT 540M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega M GH	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX Vega M GH Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 6,574 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	6,548	6,574
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.656 TFLOPS+49%	2.458 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1190 MHz	1200 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) — a 6.7% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GH. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	HBM2	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	204.8 GB/s+7%	192 GB/s
Bus Width	1024-bit+700%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC (4th Gen).

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder	VCE 3.0	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	UVD 6.3	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.