Radeon RX Vega M GH vs P106-100
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
P106-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar P106-100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The P106-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GH | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the P106-100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and P106-100
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 and the P106-100 reaches 6,628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,548 | 6,628+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1920+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+82% |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 1733 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 96 | 120+25% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 720 KB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the P106-100 has 4 GB. The P106-100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+700% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 250mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 250mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 65.5 | 88.4+35% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the P106-100 launched at $224 and now averages $30. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 220.9 (P106-100) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $224 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 220.9 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GP104 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #373 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega M GH and P106-100
