Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro M4000
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and Quadro M4000
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 and the Quadro M4000 reaches 6,679 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,548 | 6,679+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS+46% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz+17% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 480 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000 has 8 GB. The Quadro M4000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) — a 3% advantage for the Quadro M4000. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 211 GB/s+3% |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+300% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 1st Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 0% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 65.5 | 66.8+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791 and now averages $350. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 19.1 (Quadro M4000) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $791 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 19.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GM204 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #373 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega M GH and Quadro M4000
