
Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T1000

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro T1000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega M GH remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and Quadro T1000

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,548 | 6,505 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 1455 MHz+22% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 has 4 GB. The Quadro T1000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+300% | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 4th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 65.5 | 130.1+99% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400 and now averages $425. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 15.3 (Quadro T1000) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $425 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 15.3 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | TU117 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #373 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














