
Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 and the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE reaches 6,707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,548 | 6,707+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS+38% | 2.657 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz+15% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 480 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) — a 70.7% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GH. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) — the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s+71% | 120 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+433% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 1st Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE's 81W — a 21% difference. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 81W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 65.5 | 82.8+26% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GM204 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | October 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #373 | #408 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














