Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 Max-Q

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

127%

#2

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+6.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T2000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX Vega M GH Benchmark Check

Quadro T2000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 6,959 — the Quadro T2000 Max-Q leads by 6.3%. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,548	6,959+6%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.656 TFLOPS+10%	3.318 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1190 MHz	1620 MHz+36%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	HBM2	GDDR6
Bus Width	1024-bit+300%	256-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
DirectX	12_1	12.1
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP9.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Encoder	VCE 3.0	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.