
Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GRID P40-3Q

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:

GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-3Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-3Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P40-3Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and GRID P40-3Q

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,548 | 6,570 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS+60% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-3Q has 4 GB. The GRID P40-3Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+700% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Tesla NVDEC.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | Tesla NVENC x24 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | Tesla NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 65.5+124% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($5699 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 1.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GK104 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #373 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














