Radeon RX Vega M GH
VS
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018Core: 1063 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018Core: 1139 MHzBoost: 1404 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
182%
#8
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon RX Vega M GHQuadro P3200 Max-Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega M GH remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and Quadro P3200 Max-Q

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 and the Quadro P3200 Max-Q reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1404 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GHQuadro P3200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
6,548
6,500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1536
1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.656 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS+38%
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1404 MHz+18%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
96
112+17%
L1 Cache
384 KB
672 KB+75%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.5 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GHQuadro P3200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GHQuadro P3200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
HBM2
GDDR6
Bus Width
1024-bit+300%
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.5 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GHQuadro P3200 Max-Q
DirectX
12_1
12 (12_1)
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GHQuadro P3200 Max-Q
Encoder
VCE 3.0
6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 6.3
3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GHQuadro P3200 Max-Q
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
65.5
86.7+32%