
Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega M GH remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 and the Quadro P3200 Max-Q reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1404 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,548 | 6,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1792+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS | 5.032 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 1404 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 672 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+300% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 65.5 | 86.7+32% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















