Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T2000 (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 (móvel)

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

97%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

95%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

92%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

91%

#90

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1061%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

100%

#111

Quadro P520

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#113

Radeon Pro WX 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $65

93%

#117

Radeon Pro 580X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

90%

#118

Radeon Pro WX 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $45

90%

#119

CMP 40HX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $120

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+6.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T2000 (móvel) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX Vega M GH Benchmark Check

Quadro T2000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and Quadro T2000 (móvel)

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 6,959 — the Quadro T2000 (móvel) leads by 6.3%. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	6,548	6,959+6%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.656 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1190 MHz	1785 MHz+50%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	HBM2	GDDR6
Bus Width	1024-bit+300%	256-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
DirectX	12_1	12.1
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP9.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Encoder	VCE 3.0	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 50% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega M GH	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
TDP	100W	60W-40%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	65.5	116.0+77%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 46.4 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).